Aside from the time expenditure, the odds of making an error in the count is great. However, EE would definitely not recommend that anyone sit down and count through 179 unpaginated pages to create a citation. The options-and the considerations that effect our choice-are first discussed at EE2.37 (in the Fundamentals of Citation chapter). Sometimes, one is the better approach sometimes the other is.
Blended family tree maker 2014 manual#
The manual offers varied examples that demonstrate both ways of citing an image at FamilySearch: by both the exact URL and the path. We should add a couple of comments just to clarify for other readers:ĮE is not as restrictive as you propose. Thanks to agilchrist, you've had good advice in the meanwhile. EE Qcheck LR VR Register, 12.14 and 9.6 would say use the following:įirst, our apologies for not responding promptly while we were off conferencing.
Blended family tree maker 2014 how to#
>Which does not conform to EE, however is very explicit in how to find the image. The reason being the path information is in the actual citation. But I would not include all of the path information on a FamilySearch citation. I might add the image number to the citation to make it easier to find. This allows me to go right to the image if need be but if the link changes I can still find it from my original citation. This tinyurl would be added to the web address box on the generic citation page. In FTM the next thing I do is to create a tinyurl. It also means I don't have to spend endless hours trying to make FTM do something it was not set up to do and gives me complete control over what my citations look like. This allows me to keep my citations from FamilySearch and the Family History Library consistent. If I had used the film instead of the digital image my citation would be:ĭedham, Norfolk County, Massachusetts, births, marriages & deaths, register, 1635-1777, unpaginated, death entry Eunice Arnold, FHL microfilm 593,353. The film number came from going back to the first image of the database. This citation emphasis the actual register and not the database. My citation would be written as follows and placed in the citation detail box.ĭedham, Norfolk County, Massachusetts, births, marriages & deaths, register, 1635-1777, unpaginated, death entry Eunice Arnold, "Massachusetts, Town Clerk Vital and Town Records, 1627-2001," digital images, FamilySearch ( : accessed ) digital images from FHL microfilm 593,353. This is also where I italicize the appropriate text. This title is removed from the actual source print out by removing it from the reference note box in the source section of FTM. I use the genetic form and lump my source titles. I use FTM but do not use the template feature to create my citations. It puts the comma outside the " on the original record name next to unpaginated.ĭoes anyone else have an idea on how to make these digital image citations better/easier to handle in FTM? That almost gets me there, but here is the result:ĭedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, "Town Records 1635-1777", unpaginated, 179th page, Eunice Arnold digital images, FamilySearch, Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1627-2001 ( : accessed ). Unpaginated, 179th page, Eunice Arnold digital images, FamilySearch, Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1627-2001 ( : accessed ) The only way to get this to work is use VRRegister (local record), don't put in a source repository and put the following in the citation detail: It always appends the source repository on the end, and I'm not creating source repositories for EVERY image and access date, that would be crazy. I've tried Vital Records Register (Local Record), generic database and several other ways to get FTM to format this cite correctly with no luck. Which does not conform to EE, however is very explicit in how to find the image.ĮE Qcheck LR VR Register, 12.14 and 9.6 would say use the following:ĭedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, "Town Records 1635-1777," unpaginated, 179th page, Eunice Arnold, digital images, FamilySearch, Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1627-2001 ( : accessed ) "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1627-2001," images, FamilySearch ( : accessed ), Norfolk > Dedham > Births, marriages, deaths 1635-1853 > image 179 of 763 town clerk offices, Massachusetts. My EE is getting tattered and so are my nerves with FTM. Ok, so I've looked around a bit and did some searches and didn't come up with a satisfactory answer or workaround, so I'll try here.
0 kommentar(er)
